Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 21,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2018, 11:51 am
Ultimately, the court determined that the plaintiff’s knowledge of the hazard precluded any liability on the defendant shop-owner’s part. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 11:01 am
The defendant's period of probation began to run when the criminal defendant was incarcerated. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 10:20 am
This can be especially true if the defendant in your case is a public entity. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
Fictitious names are particularly useful when the client just brought you the case, the statute of limitations is about to run, and you've had time to identify only one of several potentially liable defendants. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 12:18 pm
In an action by the guardian of the person and property of an incompetent (ward), the founder and former president and chief executive officer of defendant and third-party plaintiff, a not-for-profit corporation formed in 1968 to deliver various health-related and other services to the poor in the South Bronx. [read post]
26 May 2016, 12:39 pm
Romano a duty to defend the underlying action, and it affirmed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 9:01 pm
If, however, someone else handles the case, the initial prosecutor would be civilly liable. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:02 pm
The complaint demands $1,000,000 for ACORN and $500,000 for each of the individual plaintiffs, plus punitive damages of $1,000,000 against each defendant, and an injunction against further broadcast of the videos.Maryland's statute requires consent from all parties to record -- which the defendants clearly appear to have lacked. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 3:47 pm
Are unions liable for collecting them? [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
A driver who is ticketed after a motor vehicle accident is confronted with two important issues: How will the ticket affect the person’s driver’s license? [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 am
The retroactive application of the ruling to Bohan is a bit harsh — Werth came out just a couple of days before the judge dismissed Bohan’s suit — but the bigger problem is that there’s another recent Supreme Court case which holds that an attorney isn’t liable to a third party unless the third party is in privity with the client, and Bohan wasn’t. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:09 am
It’s “commercial” that’s doing the work here, because Gensler involved the defendant’s use of claims on his business website and associated Flickr account.] [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
The District Court noted that, “[u]nder Sparler, Plaintiff’s general release…..will not preclude Plaintiff from pursuing the present action against Defendant for UIM benefits because the executed release did not contain language unequivocally discharging Defendant from its contractual obligation to provide UIM benefits to Plaintiff. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 5:20 am
” Even assuming that Best’s cited cases, which allowed a reverse passing off claim when a defendant markets another’s product that’s been only slightly modified and then relabeled, survived Dastar, that wasn’t the situation here. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 12:22 pm
Doctors who fail to do so may be liable for malpractice. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 10:52 am
Defendant’s goal was to reduce her own apportionment of fault by placing at least some of the blame on plaintiff’s employer. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:52 pm
Only when a defendant’s responsibility is more than 50% can it be held jointly and severally liable for all of the claimant’s damages to be recovered, minus the amount attributed to the claimant and all settlement proceeds. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 10:28 pm
The daughter also requested double and punitive damages for the defendant’s wrongful transfer of the trust property. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 2:00 pm
The term simply refers to the plaintiff's interest in having restored to it any benefit the defendant achieves. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm
And so it rejected plaintiff’s attempt to stall things: “[T]he Court finds that Defendant's motion to dismiss on the basis of federal preemption is properly before the Court. [read post]
