Search for: "MATTER OF T L S" Results 7501 - 7520 of 8,935
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am by admin
California didn’t start enforcing the rule on reefers until December 2009. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 5:26 pm by Christian Stegmaier
Though we don't typically profile products liability cases in this blog, we wanted to write about it because of the Court's holding, which turned on the admissibility of expert witness testimony. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 5:23 pm by Kim Krawiec
Int’l Banking L. and Reg. 28 (2004) (with Jeremiah S. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 10:00 am by Ray Dowd
L'Oreal USA, Inc., 406 F.3d 905 (7th Cir.2005) (holding no preemption where photo model asserted right of publicity claim against photo copyright holder).It is true that Defendant's videogame is a work of authorship entitled to copyright protection, see Midway Mfg. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 7:02 pm
See Seachange Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am by Bexis
  But what the FDA can demand as a regulatory matter simply ain’t what the common-law requires. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The agreement with Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray and OEPA director Chris Korleski, will require A&L Salvage to forfeit more than $4 million in financial-assurance bonds so the money may be used to cap the landfill’s 42-acre disposal area. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:05 am by Mike Aylward
” The Seventh Circuit found that it analysis was complemented by the Fourth Circuit’s opinion last year in CACI Int’l v. [read post]
Editor’s Note: Charles Nathan is Of Counsel at Latham & Watkins LLP and is co-chair of the firm’s Corporate Governance Task Force. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Assuming that it is possible for a filter to constructively identify whether or not a downloader (or uploader, for that matter) had the right to do so (it's not), and ignoring the privacy violations involved in examining Internet users' communications, the filters themselves are too imperfect to be useful, as Venkat Balasubramani reminds us at SpamNotes. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 4:13 pm by Buce
I offer this point not as a criticism: on Gorton's own showing, you can make a pretty good case for the proposition that they didn't really matter: it was the bank run wot done it, and the rest is just window dressing. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 1:39 pm
What it didn't find was that "readily" was indefinite. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:38 am by J
The claimant sought to argue that s.20B, 1985 Act didn’t prevent a subsequent correction of an error. [read post]