Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 55,566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 9:30 am
The plaintiffs were two lieutenants, a captain, and a major. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:05 pm
The third-year writes First One @ One First, chronicling his attempt to be the first one in line to hear all major arguments before the Supreme Court this term. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:36 am
I also personally wonder if Covid, Inc., the Arizona-based A/V connectivity solutions company, has seen a positive or negative effect from internet search traffic. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:35 am
In Gecewicz v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 1:47 pm
One case likely to raise the stakes considerably, if granted review, is perhaps the most significant voting rights case in decades -- Northwest Austin Municipal District Number One v. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Such was the holding of the April 11, 2013 decision of the Appellate Division, First Department, in Sequeira v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 8:32 pm
The most ridiculous case I’ve read in law school is District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 2:55 am
" As was the case in the Robertson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:34 am
Circuit’s decision in CFPB v. [read post]
25 Dec 2006, 8:40 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has docketed the petition for writ of certiorari in Fieger v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:52 pm
” The case at hand, Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo, considers whether the National Marine Fisheries Service can compel fishing vessels to pay the salaries of federal observers ensuring stocks are not overfished. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:16 am
In Sienkiewicz v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 10:29 am
Gerstein: “The two judges in the majority, U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:03 pm
Louisiana - The Majority Opinion Kennedy v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:18 am
The appeal was dismissed unanimously, although the reasoning was by 5-4 majority. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
Held: by a majority (Lord Hope and Lady Hale dissenting), allowing the appeal. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:32 am
In Wal-Mart v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:15 am
The balance I have to draw would have been more difficult if the delay point was still live but that was sorted out during the hearing and I can transfer this case safe in the knowledge that I am not building in major delays by doing so. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 11:07 pm
UOI2:1 judgment against NEET, in which Justice Kabir was in the majority, has invited a huge controversy. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 8:41 am
The majority concluded that the rule that the prisoner was seeking was a new one that didn't apply retroactively under Teague v. [read post]
