Search for: "May v. May" Results 7501 - 7520 of 183,010
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2013, 4:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Neither element may be used separately. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:53 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
On 22 June 2011, the Supreme Court heard appeals on the joined cases of Edwards V Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2010] EWCA Civ 571 and Botham v Ministry of Defence [2010] EWHC 646 (QB). [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 10:59 pm
Noonan -- Even as the Senate may be preparing to vote on a patent "reform" bill that contains (for the first time) provisions codifying a standard for inequitable conduct, the Federal Circuit continues to develop its own inequitable conduct jurisprudence. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:17 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Sue Epstein at the Star-Ledger, who attended yesterday's arguments, has a story on the case:  "N.J. court to rule whether hospitals may refuse life support despite wishes of families, patients. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 4:07 pm
Because your health insurance company may well deny benefits to you, leaving you solely responsible for all of your (massive) hospitalization costs.Didn't know they could (and did) do that. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 9:53 am
  Case in point.Admittedly, as here, you may have to be willing to kill a couple of people. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:53 pm
  The Court of Appeal holds that policy objective means that California's statute that requires consumers to be warned about things that may cause cancer (via warning labels) is preempted vis-a-vis breakfast cereals in which such cancer-causing chemicals are created by baking, frying, or roasting such grains.Which is a shorthand way of saying that since telling the people the truth may cause them to react in ways we think are bad for them, we'll make sure… [read post]