Search for: "People v Levelle"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 12,300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2013, 9:02 am
A lot of people suddenly seem fonder of formal categorical exclusions, and more leery of judicial balancing, than they used to! [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:37 am
Cohen v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
On November 19, 2009, in Academic Center of Law and Business, Human Rights Division v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:16 pm
Correction Law Article 6-C, the Sex Offender Registration Act, effective 21 January 1996, modeled after New Jersey's "Megan's Law", was meant to address the need to protect the public from the risk of repeat offenses by perpetrators of sex crimes, deemed inherently susceptible to recidivism as held in People v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:11 am
He fought the Massachusetts Sex Offender Registry Board’s determination that he needed to register as a level 3 sex offender. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 11:59 am
[Footnote: See, e.g., Rodriguez-Quinones v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 11:30 am
One way to test the argument would be to take a comparative look at the economic contributions of copyright industries between jurisdictions with different levels of copyright protection. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:27 am
Sally Beauty Co., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
CARTER v. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 3:08 pm
Rev. 693 (1976) --Poe v. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 4:42 am
” * * * Limited criminal liability In its May 2013 decision in People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:12 am
In the case of Magner v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:37 am
I guess that only few people doubt this today. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:07 am
Part V offers evidence that this remained true from 1880 to 1930. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Ellerth and Faragher v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:39 am
Notes for--Planned Parenthood of SE PA v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:42 pm
It is aware of the Fifth Circuit’s recent decision in Asadi v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:30 am
In its decision, Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 10:32 am
Addressed in the context of a marihuana (marijuana) sale, In People v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
And in Dayco (Canada) Limited v. [read post]
