Search for: "Peter v. Peter"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 8,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
One study back in the 60’s showed that in the years after Mapp v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 7:37 am
(Campbell v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:45 pm
(See, e.g., Findlay v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
” The cert. petitions in that case, United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:21 pm
Back in 1834, the Supreme Court decided in Wheaton v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:18 pm
Super Lawyers named Chicago and Oak Brook business trial attorneys Peter Lubin and Vincent DiTommaso Super Lawyers in the Categories of Class Action, Business Litigation, and Consumer Rights Litigation. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 2:20 pm
I don't think that Douglas, Peter, James, Theophilus Wildebeest and that blonde woman, whose name I can never remember, will be terribly impressed if I tell them that I haven't patented it because a lawyer I know says that patents are a waste of time. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm
(Thanks to Peter Lederer for the H/T). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:14 am
Anderson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 12:21 am
by Lasse Søndergaard Christensen “In a recent decision from 1 October 2018 (B-2740-17) the Danish Eastern High Court affirmed a decision of the Danish Commercial Court from December 2017 (V-8-17) in which the court had ruled that a café in Copenhagen had infringed the trademark rights and copyrights to the character Obelix which rightfully belongs to Les Editions Albert René S.A.R.L (Albert René). [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
The main two studies I'm aware of are: Hahn, Peter W. and Susan D. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
And, finally, Dmitri is pleased to find one field where AI is succeeding without controversy, as machine learning declares a famous Peter Paul Rubens painting, Samson and Delilah, to be a fake. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 12:06 pm
McCormick v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:39 pm
The second morning panel will examine the impact of the Supreme Court’s 2006 opinion in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 12:00 am
To understand just how broad the definition of a public purpose has become, look at the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 10:01 pm
It is USA v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 3:54 am
Feingold and his co-author, the constitutional scholar Peter Prindiville, say the problem is that there is no certainty that the convention could be forced to stick to a defined agenda. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
The supporting briefs for both sides in Trump v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:24 pm
The new law codifies and expands on a 2018 California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
