Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 22,232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2015, 3:00 am
Hirmez v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:15 am
Such a requirement, the state argued, “would be an extraordinary burden on States — all while this Court assured States in Montgomery that retroactively implementing Miller’s rule would not impose an onerous burden. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
It says “Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:12 am
Morley v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
May 2, 2011) (applying a “substantial burden” test to determine whether to apply heightened scrutiny to county ordinance);United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
” (citing Elrod v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 11:18 am
In Hill v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
Bridgestone Firestone, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
Similarly, in Preston v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:52 pm
Innes, 117 N.J. 496, 518 (1990) (stating a settlement agreement should be enforced by a trial court only to the extent it is equitable and just); Miller v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:06 pm
Apr. 3, 2009), on remand from Golan v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
It seems axiomatic that the forced disclosure of associational contacts with the head of the state Republican party will have an associational burden. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:50 pm
LEXIS 23848 (ED CA, March 15, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge concluded that inmates failed to state a claim against the California State Personnel Board in connection with their complaint that no Wiccan prison chaplains were hired for their facility.In Jackson v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
Here, summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's cause of action alleging a breach of fiduciary duty was properly granted since defendants met their burden on their motion and, in opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a question of fact that defendants' breach proximately caused it any ascertainable damages (see Boone v Bender, 74 AD3d at 1113; Brodeur v Hayes, 18 AD3d 979, 980-981 [2005], lv dismissed and denied 5 NY3d 871 [2005]). [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 10:32 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 2:34 pm
When United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 1:28 pm
See Philadelphia v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 3:29 am
Besides, the editors continued, “perhaps in a post-Roe v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Thus, a case like State v. [read post]
