Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 7501 - 7520 of 9,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
The complaints involved a potential story about a doctor and his alleged activity as a sperm donor. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
’” In this case, the doctor testified that the medical history form would never be made available to employers, which only receive a letter stating if an employee can perform job duties. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:37 am by Michelle Yeary
  That’s precisely the scenario that prompted the case of Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 10:19 am by Susan Brenner
(And the same principle underlies other evidentiary privileges, like the doctor-patient privilege or the priest-penitent privilege.) [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 5:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
Almost certainly merely negligent misstatements (by ordinary citizens, not by doctors counseling their patients) can't be restricted (see Winter v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
RK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 456 (20 April 2011)  Court of appeal sends Zimbabwean asylum case back to tribunal as need more evidence as to whether they would have to lie about political beliefs. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:23 am by R. David Donoghue
The doctor-patient relationship did not create either agency or a contractual obligation. [read post]