Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2011, 1:53 am
In Barnum Timber v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
First, the Eastern District of Texas analyzed United States Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
The stockholder in VeriFone had brought derivative litigation in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
But federal and state laws, and judicial doctrines, allow courts to vacate arbitrator awards. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:28 am
§ 157(a) Indeed, in the Southern District of New York, the district [*5] court automatically refers all such cases to the bankruptcy court in the first instance. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:33 am
The judge next concluded that even if he were to reach the merits of the issue, he would have determined that the breathalyzer source code is scientifically reliable, in part relying on the decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Justice BhandariThe Supreme Court in State of Uttranchal v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 9:17 am
Now the case is pending in the District Court. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
While most attention, rightly, has been paid to the the constitutional issues, the district court’s ruling in Florida v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:52 am
In King v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:03 am
Public policy precludes the arbitrating of court’s directing the removal of assigned personnel in alleged violation of the terms of a CBAMatter of County of Broome v New York State Law Enforcement Officers Union, Dist. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
However, these standards were vacated by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit after the Court found EPA’s definition of “commercial or industrial waste” conflicted with the language of the Clean Air Act in NRDC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
However, these standards were vacated by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit after the Court found EPA’s definition of “commercial or industrial waste” conflicted with the language of the Clean Air Act in NRDC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:29 am
We agree with the district court’s well-reasoned analysis. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
With regard to the first Graham factor, the scope and content of the prior art, the district court correctly found no genuine issue of material fact. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 12:53 pm
The states did not argue that the revisions to the Medicaid grant program violate the 4-factor test in S.D. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:52 am
The Ohio Supreme Court initially held that this was permissible in State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:22 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:35 pm
First, the defendant would be convicted after trial, appeal to the Appeals Court and to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. [read post]
