Search for: "State v. Levell " Results 7501 - 7520 of 29,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2019, 7:38 am by Brian Cordery
There was no motivation to product an antibody with the high levels of fucose claimed in the patent; the skilled person “would not bother to do so”. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 2:00 pm by Doug Cornelius
Title V creates a whole new disclosure regime for private funds. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 4:25 am by Lisa Rodgers
That connection had very little to do with Britain, and much more to do with the ‘theatre-level’ operations on the ground mediated through EURLEX. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm by John Floyd
  The three Republican judges on the emoluments panel decision were: Paul V. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 11:58 am by David Vitale
Aptiv, Audi, Baidu, BMW, Continental, Daimler, Fiat Chrysler, Here, Infineon, Intel and Volkswagen partnered on the project, the purpose of which is to highlight safety by design and verification and validation (V&V). [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 11:58 am by David Vitale
Aptiv, Audi, Baidu, BMW, Continental, Daimler, Fiat Chrysler, Here, Infineon, Intel and Volkswagen partnered on the project, the purpose of which is to highlight safety by design and verification and validation (V&V). [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:24 pm by Florian Mueller
But, at least for now, the related case law in the United States is fundamentally better than in Germany, though this may be attributable in no small part to the historic happenstance of what cases were put before the courts in what sequence--and what questions for review the parties raised.Just so there is no misunderstanding: Dr. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 5:31 pm by Anthony Zaller
Minimum Wage Increases on the State and Local Levels: What you Need to Know Here’s a brief overview of what employers need to know about minimum wage increases. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
The first published case to determine the admissibility of expert testimony regarding retrograde extrapolation was State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
The first published case to determine the admissibility of expert testimony regarding retrograde extrapolation was State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:42 am by Robert B. Lamm
  It would also vitiate the silly outcome U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
**   * The decision notes that City "presented ample evidence that it passed the 2010 Ordinance only after pursuing a range of measures to increase revenue and cut expenses" and although New York law permitted the City to require the appellants to contribute up to 50 percent of the premium amount, the 2010 Ordinance required the Retirees to contribute substantially less.** In McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, Ct. of Appeals, 92 N.Y.2d 326, the Court of Appeals ruled that in… [read post]