Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 28,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 12:06 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
Holbrook v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
Holbrook v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
United States 19-1260Issues: (1) Whether the discretion recognized under Kimbrough v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:01 pm
Greene, 200 W.Va. 421, 490 S.E.2d 23 (1997) (determining common law claim for retaliatory discharge based on sex discrimination in light of West Virginia's public policy found in state human relations act); Roberts v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:07 am
Id. at 16 (quoting Menard v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:12 am
National Union Fire v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 8:27 am
” In light of this interpretation of Supreme Court precedent, these judges thought it would be futile to take up the case en banc. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
Circuit in American Meat Institute v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York 2012); State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers tells the “long-shot” story of United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 5:43 pm
Bayne v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:42 am
(SD Kohli v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:49 pm
The opinion may be downloaded below.Download PDF file of Exxon Shipping v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 8:59 pm
The plaintiff's proposed market definition did not encompass all interchangeable substitute products, even under the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and therefore dismissal was proper.More detail of Chapman v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:42 am
(SD Kohli v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:16 pm
It examined dicta from Prince v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:03 pm
The CJEU assessed the retention obligation in the light of the following safeguards (but did not expressly state whether the following safeguards were alternative or cumulative conditions): Was there any “differentiation, limitation or exception being made in the light of the objective of fighting against serious crime”? [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 12:12 pm
Vargas in S.G v. [read post]
