Search for: "State v. Lively"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 28,992
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
.* Jeremy Phillips' words of warning- and some further thoughtsStarting from Jeremy's words at the 10th anniversary JIPLP program, Neil reflects on the state of IP in the universities. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Sarver v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 11:25 am
Their stories came to light through Hurrell-Harring et al. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:25 am
Kentucky has learned how to frustrate attempts by injured workers, and their employers, to get back on the job after a work injury.The state's Supreme Court on April 2, in Quad/Graphics v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:15 am
In Klein v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 9:29 am
Service will only get more complicated from hereState v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 12:15 pm
These changes will make an enormous difference in the day-to-day lives of disabled prisoners. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:41 am
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court's Decision in Windsor v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:00 am
Supreme Court's decision in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
The United States Supreme Court handed down its long anticiated ruling in Arizona v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:35 am
-Alabama v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:46 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:54 pm
In doing so she brings up the matter of Continental Casualty Company v United States of America et al. and Ute Sistrunk v United States of America et al. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:40 pm
(Eugene Volokh) That was the order in today’s N.G. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:04 am
The treasurer's office made a video recording of the live feed from these cameras, but the video quality “was not as high as the live feed. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
You weren't going out to try to search where they live. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:45 am
” In that case, the Eighth Circuit explained that considering an inmate an employee would not be consistent with the FLSA’s primary purpose of “providing minimum standards of living for workers,” since it had no application in the prison context, where a prisoner’s minimum standard of living is established by state policy and is not substantially affected by wages. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
The court then said that while “numerous cases have held that it is possible for an individual to maintain more than one bona fide residence, in People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:22 am
United States and Overton v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
