Search for: "State v. South" Results 7501 - 7520 of 10,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2025, 9:54 am by INFORRM
South Africa Els v. eMedia Investments (Pty) LtdDecision Date: November 19, 2024 A High Court in South Africa refused an application to interdict the broadcasting of footage obtained by a media company doorstepping a businessman accused of financial misconduct. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection South Korea and the UK have reached an “adequacy agreement in principle” for cross-border data sharing. [read post]
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
In its table of cases cited, it lists the landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
The Court summarised the guidance in South Bucks District Council v Porter [2003] 2AC 558 on the discretion under Section 187 B of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as follows: (1) The principal purpose of the jurisdiction to grant an injunction under section 187 B is to promote compliance with planning law. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by INFORRM
The Treasurer of the Liberal National Party, Barry O’Sullivan, is being sued for defamation by Geoffrey Greene, the former state director of the party in Queensland. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Peter Holmes a Court v Tony Papaconstuntinos [2011] NSWCA 59 the Court of Appeal of New South Wales allowed the appeal of businessman Peter Holmes a Court holding that the publications complained of were published on an occasion of qualified privilege. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
South Carolina Coastal Council. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am by Dave Maass
Second, the claims are ineligible for patent protection under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]