Search for: "Superior Court of California" Results 7501 - 7520 of 10,170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm by Jeff Gamso
Walker, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:47 pm by Maxwell Kennerly
Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:02 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
"Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:23 pm by Michael
Indeed the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California constitution the notion that opposite sex couples are superior to same sex couples. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:18 pm
Indeed the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California constitution the notion that opposite sex couples are superior to same sex couples.'By those words and many others contained in the 138-page ruling in Perry v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:15 pm by PaulKostro
Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that oppositesex couples are superior to same-sex couples. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:18 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm by Amanda Beck
  “Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite-sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:39 pm by David Lat
Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite-sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 10:11 am by Eric Lipman
Martin and other chefs and restaurants have filed a class action complaint in California Superior Court, alleging that a host of olive oil manufacturers have been bottling up inferior product, labeling it "extra virgin," and selling it for much more than it's actually worth. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 9:05 am by Ronda Muir
  With contingency fee arrangements, lawyers may have an incentive to go to court to try to get a higher award than the settlement offer or because the fee structure pays a higher contingency percentage for awards won in court. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:26 am by Kent Scheidegger
Mitchell Sims' suit in Marin County (home of the Big Q) Superior Court "say[s] the state didn't follow the rules while gaining its newfound approval," reports Scott Smith in the Stockton Record. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:49 pm by David J. Clark
  The New York court noted, among other things, that a lawsuit commenced by defendants against Marsh in the Superior Court of the State of California, No. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:06 am by Matthew Lavrinets
Superior Court, S170550, the Supreme Court disagreed with the trial court in the matter, which had held that Pitchess discovery is not normally available before a preliminary hearing because such discovery is relevant only to issues at trial, where the prosecution has to prove a defendant's guilt. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 5:11 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
  Kreidler assumed control of Cascade National in 2004 when the company was placed in receivership by Thurston County Superior Court after failing to meet financial requirements under state law saying the company’s deteriorating financial condition meant it could not be saved or sold. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm by The Complex Litigator
 The class action case against Verizon went to a jury trial on June 16, 2008, in the Alameda County Superior Court. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 8:59 am
Further, in the case Cottle v. the Superior Court of Ventura County (1992) 3 Cal.App.4th 1367, the Court of Appeal denied the plaintiff's petition for a writ of mandate seeking review of the order of the trial court which required plaintiff to produce evidence establishing a prima facie claim for personal injury. [read post]