Search for: "T. BROWN" Results 7501 - 7520 of 18,668
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2015, 4:51 am by Jack Pringle
And paradoxically (aren’t all essential things paradoxical?) [read post]
16 May 2015, 5:18 am
So if you're thinking in terms of what makes admissions brochures look like Benetton ads, you don't want 70% Asians -- but you can get away with more whites because you can have blondes, brunettes, and redheads, with brown eyes, blue eyes, and green eyes. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:04 pm by Rahul Bhagnari
The city's police should also remember that it isn't the first department to come under scrutiny for disproportionately targeting Black people for bicycle stops. [read post]
14 May 2015, 9:51 am by Jon Sands
Brown, No. 13-10354 (Berzon with Reinhardt and Gould) --- What should happen when a defendant wants to fire his retained counsel? [read post]
13 May 2015, 1:22 pm
What do you do when (1) a retained criminal defense attorney takes $50,000 from the defendant to represent him, (2) (allegedly) doesn't prepare at all for the upcoming trial, but instead simply tries to persuade the defendant to plea, and then (3) on the eve of trial, both the defendant and counsel express displeasure with the resulting situation, with the attorney moving to withdraw (because the defendant won't take a plea) and the defendant asking to fire his attorney… [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am by Reuel Schiller
Even if the California courts didn’t wish to go that far (this was, after all, three years before Brown v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:50 am by Jon Hyman
HIPAA isn’t the only law that mandates the confidentiality of medical information. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
Hotak (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Kanu (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Johnson (Appellant) v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondent)Crisis & Shelter, EHRC, SS for CLG interveners [2015] UKSC 30 The thing about the Supreme Court is that all those years of accrued, encrusted High Court and Court of Appeal case law just don’t matter. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:53 am by Benjamin Wittes
Given Judge Sentelle’s comments at oral argument, this approach certainly won’t have his vote, and notwithstanding my comment on Saturday, I doubt it will attract either of the other two panelists either: Stephen Williams or Janice Rogers Brown. [read post]
10 May 2015, 10:03 am by Walter Olson
At any event, Johnson has now filed a lawsuit against the town and against Wilson for being stopped and for the subsequent gunfire: Johnson wasn’t hit, but says he was endangered by the shots. [read post]