Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2010, 6:41 pm
A caveat here, Petitioners are not required in their Petition or Review to state the issues they are challenging. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
HUYEN BICH NGUYEN, Petitioner. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 8:02 am
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) refused to apply the earlier priority date. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 8:02 am
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) refused to apply the earlier priority date. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 12:18 am
The lawyer for the United States is Mark Eckenwiler, DOJ’s guru on electronic surveillance. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:15 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:42 am
Now, engaging in gay sex in private is not a crime of moral turpitude in the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:30 am
He speculates that by granting the motion, the Court has suggested that it might be inclined to adopt a more limited ruling based on the incorporation of the Second Amendment against the states through the Due Process Clause, rather than the petitioners’ broader argument, which also relies on the Privileges or Immunities Clause. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:50 pm
Historically, the Sonoran pronghorn ranged in the United States from approximately the Santa Cruz River, Arizona, in the east, to the Gila Bend and Kofa Mountains, Arizona, to the north, and to Imperial Valley, California, to the west. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:04 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has a post on the “surprisingly narrow argument” made by the petitioners in City of Ontario v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:50 am
United States": The Cavalier Daily, the student newspaper of the University of Virginia, has this front page article today. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:29 pm
[fn3] In its amicus brief supporting rehearing en banc, the United States pointed out the serious analytical errors in the Ninth Circuit’s conclusions, arguing, among other things, that there generally is no reasonable expectation of privacy in text messages sent and received. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:02 am
§ 1973, applies to state felon disenfranchisement laws that result in discrimination on the basis of race; and (2) whether the Massachusetts felon disenfranchisement scheme established in 2000 violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution as applied to those Massachusetts felons who were incarcerated and yet had the right to vote prior to 2000? [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
The primary objective of the adjustments to the Schedule of Fees is to ensure that fees for consular services reflect costs to the United States of providing the services. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 8:45 am
abstract_id=1548473).What It's AboutThe study collected 9,526 bankruptcy petitions across the United States, comparing dismissal rates based on gender, race, and the probable political allegiances of the judge and county. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
Castaneda (08-1529; 08-1547) – petitioner’s reply brief United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 8:16 am
United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 1:58 pm
United States now includes a link to the petitioner’s brief, while respondents’ briefs have been added to the case pages for Skilling v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am
Discussion of the Citizens United decision continues. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:00 pm
CBP HQ stated that those questioned were offered the opportunity to contact their consulate and that CBP officers contacted the petitioner and/or current employer when clarification was needed. [read post]
