Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2014, 11:02 am
One case, United States v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:37 pm
Justice Sotomayor, for example, wrote in her concurrence in United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 2:03 pm
The United States Chamber of Commerce invites credentialed members of the press to its pre-Term media briefing on October 3 from 9:30-11 a.m. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 11:38 am
Augusto (opinion), United States District Court, Central District of California, District Judge Stanton (appeal pending) Section 109 of the Copyright Act is an explicit statute that entitles “the owner of a particular copy …without the authority of the copyright owner, to sell or otherwise dispose of the possession of that copy…. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:06 pm
Virginia, which struck down anti-miscegenation laws in the United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
California) from the United States Supreme Court, which ruled 9-0 in June 2014 that law enforcement cannot search an arrestee’s phone unless they have a warrant. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:45 am
Beutz v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm
Peter Hirtle, Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center Advisory Board It is very difficult to determine whether works are in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 4:06 pm
United States that "use" requires "active employment" of the firearm against 1993's SOC holding in Smith v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Stegall (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 11:11 am
To the relief of employers, Browning-Ferris quickly appealed this decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:19 am
The Takings Clause of Article V of the United States Constitution states that “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 6:15 pm
By way of background, the United States Supreme Court has held, in the landmark case Garcetti v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
” She wrote: [C]ell phones are ill suited to prevent the type of contraband that might be present on a cell phone from entering into the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:24 am
Furthermore, the intended effects of the conspiracy -- to recover money for Daniels that would be deposited in the United States -- would have impacted the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 12:23 pm
Cappuccitti v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:42 am
Rocke v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm
United States, 272 U.S. 52, 110–39 (1926) (executive power); INS v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 7:50 am
"The opinion in Fields v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 12:42 am
Modern communication and the California Rules of Court collide in Citizens for Civic Accountability v. [read post]
