Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2014, 4:48 pm
Your Curmudgeon has just received reliable word that ECUSA and its attorneys intend to ask the United States Supreme Court to review the (interlocutory!) [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:28 am
In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews next month’s oral arguments in the cellphone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:40 am
Jude Riata wires remain active in United States patients. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:49 am
§§ 1331, 1362 and 1367, in that plaintiffs claims arise under the laws of the United States, including federal common law, plaintiff is an American Indian tribe with a governing body duly recognized by the Secretary of the Interior as maintaining government-to-government relations with the United States and exercising jurisdiction over the federal trust lands of the Cahuilla Indian Reservation in the unincorporated territory of Riverside County,… [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:41 am
Briefly: In Newsweek, Ian McDougall looks ahead at the issues in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 3:15 pm
The court also cited with approval to a California decision, Colby v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 3:58 pm
This was the first full-scale trial since the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 11:30 am
United States-Montes-Ruiz, No. 12-50398 (Rawlinson with Gould and Lemelle (EDLA)) --- In Setser v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 11:28 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:20 pm
Procedural HistoryBecton, Dickinson and Company (Becton) and Nova Biomedical Corporation (Nova) appeal the denial of various fees sought based on an eight-year long patent infringement suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California involving patents owned by Therasense, Inc. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
In the wake of the Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:50 am
At Reason.com, Damon Root looks at the issues in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:39 am
District for the Northern District of California seeking, as it wrote in its brief: a temporary restraining order and, after a hearing has been held, an order prohibiting, enjoining, and restraining defendants National Security Agency, United States of America, Department of Justice, Barack H. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
United Site Servs. of California, Inc., 2013 WL 2436605 (N.D. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 7:19 pm
“The United States District Court for the Central District of California entered summary judgment of non- infringement in favor of Google, Inc. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:59 pm
So far, no federal court of appeals has issued a final ruling on the issue since the Supreme Court’s decision last June, in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 6:25 pm
First, Cisco is an American company with offices throughout the United States, including in this state. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:37 pm
He's not entitled to be in the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 11:02 am
One case, United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:31 am
(“Danisco”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissing Danisco’s declaratory judgment action against Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. [read post]
