Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 7501 - 7520 of 24,127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Kali Borkoski
Petition for certiorari Brief for the United States Petitioner's reply (forthcoming) Vasquez v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 5:50 am by Thomas Swartz
 But the holder of a B2 tourist visa is required to have a "principal, actual dwelling place" outside the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:32 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkOpinion Date: 6/26/09Cite: IBM v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Aditi Shah
He escaped Sri Lanka to Mexico in June 2016 and in February 2017 crossed the border and entered the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 11:00 am by Jeffrey Brown
The Sixth Circuit recently affirmed the denial of a motion to suppress in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:30 pm by Rick
The United States Supreme Court today rewrote an old classic. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:43 am by Gregory Eisenreich
" Schwab's insertion of this waiver language followed the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:10 pm
In my post lauding the Obama Administration for plainly stating, in its latest filing in the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA”) case, that “the United States does not believe that DOMA is rationally related to any legitimate government interests in procreation and child-rearing,” I predicted “eruption of the right-wing volcanos. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 8:33 am by Sean Wajert
Cargotec sold 203 of those forklifts to customers in Mississippi, about 1.55% of Moffett’s United States sales. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
By comparing and contrasting United States v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Petitioner had appealed the decision and order of the United States District Court dismissing his claims brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Petitioner had appealed the decision and order of the United States District Court dismissing his claims brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. [read post]