Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 7501 - 7520 of 10,169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
DONE at the city of Washington this seventeenth day of November in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred seventy-six and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred first. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:31 am by Tomassi Law Associates
United States, No. 09-11311, but on slightly different grounds. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:05 pm
Washington, D.C. - The United States Supreme Court  has issued a decision in Microsoft v. i4i LP, against Microsoft and unanimously reaffirming that patents are presumed to be valid at the standard of clear and convincing. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:50 am by Lawrence Solum
Waters (Washington University School of Law in St. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:11 am by Adam Chandler
Plata and Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/289915.dis.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Supreme Court United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
United States, 137 U. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:29 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, the Court held that a federal sentencing court must determine whether “an offense under State law” is a “serious drug offense” by consulting the “maximum term of imprisonment” applicable to a defendant’s prior state drug offense at the time of the defendant’s conviction for that offense. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
Washington, D.C. - The United States Supreme Court has issued its opinion in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:23 pm
Washington, DC - In a decision that may impact both patent prosecutors and litigators, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit applied the analogous-art test to exclude certain prior art references from the consideration of whether a claimed invention was obvious in light of the prior art.In this case, patent applicant Arnold Klein appealed the rejection of certain claims in U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:35 am by James Bickford
Whiting mistakenly implies that immigrants who have been ordered removed from the country are therefore necessarily not authorized to work in the United States. [read post]