Search for: "Waite v. Waite"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 15,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2013, 4:45 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Unite Here Local 355 v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 10:04 am
State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
In his view* it was likely that the preliminary issue could be heard over two days, within the next four to eight months [Merpel demands to know why the parties have to wait four-to-eight months. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 2:32 am
The topic ‘In search of a legal framework to foster innovation in Europe’ will definitely be worth the wait! [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 10:08 am
” You may think, wait a minute, that’s just a firewall. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 5:01 am
., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:18 am
Supreme Court decision given in Jun 2014 in the case of Alice v CLS, which arguably makes it more difficult to obtain business method patents. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 11:04 am
We shall have to wait and see. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 12:15 am
In State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 8:45 am
Katharina Isabel Schmidt (Yale Law School) offers a comparative look at US and German law journals, blogs, and their uses in the transmission of legal ideas here in a post at the Völkerrechtsblog (English translation: Public International Law Blog). [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 11:10 am
“Wait! [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:59 am
PSC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 6:10 am
A problem code issued by respondent “triggers further review of [a] past employee’s application for re-employment” (Pepin v New York City Dept. of Educ., 45 Misc 3d 1221[A] at *3 [Sup Ct, NY County, 2014]). [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 8:27 pm
Finally, there's yet another excellent analysis from Stefano Barazza on PatLit, this time in the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling in AstraZeneca v Hanmi (the 'Nexium' case). [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:00 pm
They dropped their request for a preliminary injunction and waited. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 9:01 am
Adams v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:01 am
Supreme Court in Tennessee Valley Authority v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:37 pm
But a funny thing happened on the way to appellate review in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 8:26 am
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 4:08 am
§ 424a(d) explicitly states that a triennial redetermination is not applicable in reverse offset states.Because the NJ Legislature did not include a cost-of-living increase in the statute, and the federal statute exempts reverse offset states from reviewing its benefits triennially, we affirm the order denying a redetermination of benefits and for the reimbursement of overpayment of benefits.Wilhelm v. [read post]
