Search for: "Weeks v. United States" Results 7501 - 7520 of 19,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 11:31 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 517 U.S. 690, 697-98 (1996) (concluding that "independent appellate review" of Fourth Amendment probable cause determinations means that "even where one case may not squarely control another one, the two decisions when viewed together may usefully add to the body of law on the subject"). [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm by Linda McClain
A survey released in 2017, on the 50th anniversary of Loving, found that one in six new marriages in the United States crosses racial or ethnic lines, although the white-black line is crossed less frequently than other lines, such as white-Asian, white-Latinx, or other combinations. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:47 am by Daniel Cappetta
Specifically, in a recent case decided by the United States Supreme Court – Caetano v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(Spicy IP)   Ireland New guidelines for dealing with extensions in time (Class 46)   Malta International: Malta announces tax exemption for patent royalties (IP finance)   Poland Time of bad faith in trade mark application (Class 46)   South Africa World Cup 2010: Fake shirts pour in (Afro-IP)   Spain Court elaborates on ‘trade mark families’ (Class 46)   United Kingdom Unilever threatens legal action against BNP to prevent Marmite appearing in… [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm by Mark Walsh
There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this Court’s precedents for the Judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:06 am by Chris Jones
Late last week, rulings were issued in a cluster of cases that BB&R has been following. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:12 am by admin
The Basics In Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]