Search for: ""fair use"" Results 7521 - 7540 of 10,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2010, 3:20 am by SHG
  For most, it's a matter of fair use, since we aren't selling them and provide "value added" commentary about the content. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
Serendip had filed a Digital Millennium Copyright Act takedown notice against the video but Bond filed a counter-notice claiming that the video was a fair use. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:44 am by Jonathan Bailey
Mercedes is seeking a judgment that the use of the murals is a fair use. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:03 am by Jonathan Bailey
The case found that Google News violated copyright law by linking to and posting short snippets from articles out of French and German language newspapers in Belgium as, according to the court, there were no fair use provisions for such a use. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 2:40 pm
District Judge Nancy Gertner’s decision, on the eve of trial, to prohibit a so-called fair-use defense. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 4:15 pm
* added my Fair Use Cheat Sheet (I had routinely distributed it to students during the semester, but this year I finally remembered to include it in the reader) [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 2:21 am by gmlevine
At its simplest a prima facie case requires the complainant to establish that in using the domain name the respondent is not making a bona fide offering of goods or services [paragraph 4(c)(ii)], is not commonly known by the domain name [paragraph 4(c)(ii)] and is not making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name or otherwise justified in using the domain name on free speech principles [paragraph 4(c)(iii)]. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:15 am by gmlevine
Russ “Dutch” Boyd, D2008-1518 (WIPO December 1, 2008) (“If use following complaints were taken into account, the Policy could be rendered wholly ineffective by respondents rapidly posting websites which ostensibly constituted fair use of disputed domain names. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 2:33 am by gmlevine
Forum August 9, 2008) () although it may be some evidence that the respondent reasonably believed “that the use of the domain name was a fair use or otherwise lawful,” phrasing picked up from the Anticybersqatting Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 10:12 am by Ron Coleman
| NBA referee sues AP over “disparaging” tweet @rdd: Chi IP Lit Blog: CLE: What everyone should know about the mechanics of e-discovery @TheCyberLawyer: Copyright troll Righthaven achieves spectacular “fair use” loss | Are we sure we wanted this? [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:40 am by Terry Hart
” Jeff Koons, sculptor each claim advantage after Warhol copyright decision — “Koons told the court on Friday that his use of the bench as ‘raw material’ for ‘creative and communicative objectives entirely distinct from plaintiff’s utilitarian purpose of creating a platform for sexually explicit performances’ favored a fair-use finding. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:50 pm by Dennis Crouch
How should we balance free speech, parody, and fair use concerns? [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 11:47 am
The complaint responds by saying that the billboard, “does not constitute parody under the fair-use doctrine because the subject of the parody, Governor Bobby Jindal, is not the author of the Service Marks, as is required,” but that’s far too fine a distinction. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:25 pm by Eric
This brief argues that Google doesn't make a trademark use in commerce (I can't believe they waded into those waters again) and Google and its advertisers engage in trademark fair use. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 8:55 am
In their court filing, Colting and his publisher described the book as “a transformative commentary and criticism, a fair use of minimal elements from ‘Catcher’” Obviously, without seeing the book it is very hard for anyone to offer much commentary, but it appears that there is more to this case than what was initially said. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:20 am by Jonathan Bailey
It had been previously noted that Google was refusing to remove images that were not selfies, meaning the person in the image wasn’t likely the copyright holder, or situations where it felt issues of fair use were raised. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
 Finally, the Dear Rich Staff wants to report that if there are a limited number of ways to say something, you are permitted to express yourself in the same way as others without infringing (known as the "merger doctrine").The Trouble With FreedomThe trouble with all these "freedoms" --  the merger doctrine, the right to use facts, and even fair use -- is that there are no clear lines. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
TV Eyes wanted the court to examine the presumption of harm and Fox News and to address various fair use questions in the case. [read post]