Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 10,162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2011, 9:19 am
Recall, for example, Olmstead v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:43 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) BT flood warning to High Court – injunction to block access to Newzbin2 would be ‘thin edge of the wedge’ (1709 Blog) ISP survey: Three strikes won’t deter Pirates (TorrentFreak) United States US General FTC launching antitrust probe over Google search, ad businesses (ArsTechnica) What would a Government-operated search engine look like in the US? [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
Of particular relevance was the ECtHR decision in A v United Kingdom (2009) 49 EHRR 29. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:22 am
In fact, UK authorities are unable to deport people at such risk for other reasons; namely, the 1689 English bill of rights which outlaws “cruell and unusual punishments“ and article 3 of the 1984 United Nations Convention against Torture , which provides that “No State Party shall expel, returnor extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected… [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
United States, 350 U.S. 422, 426, 76 S.Ct. 497, 100 L.Ed. 511 (1956). [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
Network v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
The New York state Senate failed to pass a law in 2009, despite support of the bill from the then-Governor.The new Marriage Equality statute has religious exemptions, which were also hard-fought, and several otherwise conservative state senators who voted for the bill specifically referenced the “protections” for religious entities contained in the law, and absent from the previous bill. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:08 pm
Hamilton in his Report of the Bank and Marshall in McColloch v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:06 am
Last year in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:58 am
The current regulation has previously been upheld by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Long Island Care at Home, LTD. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am
GE Healthcare, Ltd., et. al (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: Judge Solis compares false marking to ‘someone who says, ‘I am not married,’ when indeed, they are’: United States of America, ex rel. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:18 pm
The majority relies heavily on United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:57 pm
"(93) The defendants appealed the case to the United States Supreme Court as part of the four case litigation encompassed in Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:37 am
”However, it should be noted Lord McCluskey’s initial report clearly states : “We do not suggest that the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court should be ended. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
In Medellin v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:31 am
In the case, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 2:22 pm
Madison) or whether the President’s claim of Executive Privilege was correct (United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:29 pm
Would the severability clause – which, a friend reminded me, is not always sacroscant (United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
” The Scottish Government’s Press Release on the bill, from earlier this week stated : Tough new laws on sectarian and offensive behaviour Bigots will face five year jail terms Tough new laws to crack down on sectarian and other forms of hatred in Scotland should be in place in time for the new football season after Ministers introduced a draft Bill to the Scottish Parliament. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:33 pm
I have previously commented on Sorrell v. [read post]
