Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 33,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
California and Justice Clarence Thomas’ more cabined understanding in his concurrence in American Legion v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:41 pm
DOT v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:37 pm
In Freeport Reg’l Water Auth. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 2:54 pm
In the 1991 California Supreme Court case of Mercer v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
On September 18, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law, Assembly Bill 5 (“AB5”), codifying the landmark case of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:40 am
Writing Dynamex into Law Broadly speaking, AB 5 codifies last year’s California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:30 am
And the Supreme Court is likely to further gut abortion rights, even if it doesn’t immediately overturn Roe v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
The bill creating the greatest buzz has been AB 5, which would codify the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:37 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:25 am
” HiQ sued LinkedIn and sought a preliminary injunction preventing LinkedIn from taking these actions, claiming that they violated California law. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:28 am
On September 18 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law AB-5, which codified the California Supreme Court’s Dynamex v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:51 pm
Show notes are located at www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/113 Yamashita v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:09 pm
Perks v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:26 am
In OTO, L.L.C. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:00 am
The California Supreme Court recently determined that employees cannot recover unpaid wages on behalf of themselves and other aggrieved employees under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) (ZB, N.A. and Zions Bancorporation v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:23 am
Details of AB5 The law requires that workers in California be considered an employee unless employers can show that the work they perform meets the rigorous criteria as designated in last year’s California Supreme Court ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:59 am
State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm
Symantec”The recent decision of the District Court of the Northern District of California, in NSS Labs. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
It has a long and storied history, going back all the way to the Civil War.[1] Prior to 1986, the statute was only infrequently utilized by law enforcement. [read post]
