Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
Tamiz marginalises Godfrey v Demon Internet, the original English internet defamation case decided in 1999. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
The CA agreed with the reasoning in a recent Hong Kong case which examined the English law on the question whether an employee may be a fiduciary and which concluded that this type of barring order could be made to protect the solicitor/client relationship but it was not appropriate to extend this type of order to the employer/employee relationship. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
The CA agreed with the reasoning in a recent Hong Kong case which examined the English law on the question whether an employee may be a fiduciary and which concluded that this type of barring order could be made to protect the solicitor/client relationship but it was not appropriate to extend this type of order to the employer/employee relationship. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:25 am
Under Cayman law share premium was distributable as dividend, whereas in English tax law share premium was treated in the same way as paid-up share capital. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
No. 403 v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:54 am
by Maurizio Borghi Patents Court London, 12 January 2012, Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas Ltd & Nicholas John Houghton. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:01 pm
The attempt by the taxpayer in this case is reminiscent of the tax avoidance transactions that shaped English law in the 80s, and in particular, of the judgment of the House of Lords in IRC v Burmah Oil. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:08 pm
Butler & V. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
The ‘Junk’ decision in 2005 (C-188/03, Junk v Kuhnel) has meant, that worker consultations need now take place before any final decision on job losses is taken. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:24 am
See A.A.M. v.. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:55 am
A majority of her cases have involved non-native speakers of English. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Black, A Constitutional Faith (1968) Certain other works dealt with obscure matters or issues of foreign law, such as the following: John Marshall Harlan, Manning the Dikes; Some Comments on the Statutory Certiorari Jurisdiction and Jurisdictional Statement Practice of the Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Ruth Bader Ginsburg, A Selective Survey of English Language Studies on Scandinavian Law (1970) Stephen G. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:25 am
For some states, that could require major spending on court-appointed lawyers for thousands of convicts.The federal case mentioned is Martinez v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
[FN2] and Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
One case that comes to mind is Mehraban v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:09 am
In Sherdley & Anr v Nordea Life and Pension SA the Court of Appeal was asked to examine whether the English Court had jurisdiction to try a claim brought by British nationals who were not, at the time proceedings were commenced, resident in the UK. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am
Also in Strasbourg at the moment is the Animal Defenders International v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
Disclaimers inserted during examining proceedings also create presumptions concerning the exclaimed subject-matter, as the appellant in the present case had to find out.The patent proprietor appealed against the decision of the Opposition Division to revoke the patent under consideration.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation; the differences with respect to claim 1 as granted are emphasized):Crop protection composition, formulated as powder, granules or… [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:09 pm
This was hinted at as far back as Bunt v Tilley (very briefly), then in Kaschke v Gray and considered most recently in Davison v Habeeb – but Tamiz is the clearest example yet (albeit still as a dismissal at an early stage of proceedings). [read post]
