Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 35,340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2013, 8:56 am
In United States v. [read post]
Federal Judge Rules That Expert Testimony is Required to Assert That Smoking Impacts Life Expectancy
20 Feb 2019, 3:00 am
Hornak of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in the case of Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 4:04 pm
” The statements complained about were stated at para 42 in the reasons : (i) “There are over 100 former patients of Dr. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 6:12 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 3:40 am
At an inter-partes hearing before the Family Proceedings Court on 31st December the mother agreed to go with him into a mother-and-baby unit. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 8:11 am
Among other feats, Judge Allen was the first woman in America appointed prosecutor (1919), elected to a general trial court (1920), elected to a state supreme court (1922), and shortlisted for nomination to the United States Supreme Court (1938). [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:45 pm
The court relied on United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:13 am
United States, 327 U. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:20 am
What would the Justices of the United States Supreme Court advised had they have been on those teams? [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:00 am
The defendants sought a commission to take the depositions of three Fujikura officers in Japan, as AFL was not prepared to produce them voluntarily in the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 8:53 pm
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 19-21. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 8:53 pm
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 19-21. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 7:15 pm
Both questions are discussed in the Second Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 2:30 am
At the same time, the Court of Appeal held that the court has inherent jurisdiction to allow non-parties inspection of: witness statements; expert reports; documents, which were read out in open court, the judge was invited to read in or outside of court or which it is clear or stated that the judge has read; written submissions deployed at hearing; and any specific documents which it is necessary for a non-party to inspect in order to meet the principle of open justice. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 11:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:20 am
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:54 am
Cal. v. [read post]
