Search for: "Little v State"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 26,856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2011, 3:43 am
You would have realized that “hottest” seems to be a very relative term in the Lone Star State. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 3:58 am
Eluding the proper scope of federal jurisdiction: United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
In Rubke v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:12 pm
Nelson in 1972 and last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
As I mentioned last week, ten years ago I wrote a descriptive and analytical law review article called Private Employees' Speech and Political Activity: Statutory Protection Against Employer Retaliation, which aimed to catalog these often-little-known statutes. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am
Yesterday the Court announced that it had granted review in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
Rory Little previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am
Similarly, Hacon HHJ stated in Teva v Novartis [2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat): “It seems that there was little or no interaction between Novartis’ three experts during the preparation of their evidence. [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:00 am
Klumb v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 8:24 am
At that point Earnest filed a postconviction challenge in state court (represented by Tom Sullivan, now at Arkansas-Little Rock). [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
The analysis of key cases in these four areas indicates that, where Congress has included a savings clause in the allegedly preemptive federal statute, the Rehnquist Court was willing to allow some redress to injured persons, yet at the same time it paid little attention to savings clauses when it came to the preemption of protective state or local regulations. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 11:43 am
In Microsoft v AT&T, in 2007, the justices clarified how the statute applies when software is transmitted from the United States but copied overseas. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 3:04 pm
The United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has a little-known viz. little-cited report titled The Evolving IP Martketplace: Aligning Patent Notice and Remedies with Competition which it issued already clear back in March 2011, but whose content is particularly relevant now in an American and world intellectual property scene dominated by monopolists, patent trolls, patent wars and a recalcitrant Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC"): The FTC… [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:03 am
Additional Resources: Texas v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 12:22 pm
State, 103 So.3d 184 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), rev. denied, State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 10:30 pm
S.M.K. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 9:17 am
Such is the case with United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 8:28 am
The measures will likely have little effect, as the U.S. has few military ties to Myanmar. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 11:05 am
Brave case of first impression brings intellectually-rigorous analysis to – challenging – sentencing fact pattern.United States v. [read post]
