Search for: "Little v State"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 23,804
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2014, 1:07 pm
In Turcios v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
, [Abstract], 38 University of Arkansas Little Rock Law Review 449-475 (2016).Hon. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 5:51 am
Plaintiff also sues under the state law prohibiting discrimination, though it does not distinguish between the state and city laws in its analysis.The case is Doe v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 1:33 pm
Those of us who regularly and zealously challenge illegal searches and seizures in criminal and traffic cases were handed a victory of sorts (victory with a very small “v”) by the Wisconsin Supreme Court last month.In State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:51 pm
However, it is submitted that when the dicta cited by the Court referr to classification, they refer to the Legislature being given “a free hand to devise classes – whom to tax or not to tax, whom to exempt and whom not to exempt” (State of U.P. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 12:21 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:57 pm
The cost to Philip Morris of trying to slant jury instructions too far in its favor -- $79.5 million in punitive damages: As I first noted in this post from this morning, today the Supreme Court of Oregon issued its ruling, on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, in Williams v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:41 am
Oral argument before the Second Circuit is not yet scheduled but will likely occur sometime in early 2024.The post Amicus Briefs in <i>Volokh v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 5:20 am
According to the lawsuit, Abdeljabbar et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:04 am
Supreme Court decision Buckley v Valeo, 424 US 1, which upheld campaign finance contribution limits stands out as the largest circle, i.e., the most cited case...cited 2,328 times. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
The potential future victims add little except the likelihood of delay. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
The purpose of the 2006 Act was specifically stated to lessen the “undue burden” trademark holders have with dilution claims. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 2:19 am
In those circumstances, procedural fairness would require the Board to give the prisoner the opportunity to state their position in relation to the allegation and to argue that no or very little account should be taken of it . [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:25 am
Citing Parker v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:25 am
Citing Parker v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 4:19 pm
In Resnick v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:32 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
The Court apparently needs to ruminate a little longer on the S.G. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
In re Application of the United States of America for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
United States, and Shoop v. [read post]
