Search for: "Parks v. State"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 10,192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2023, 12:37 pm
The lower courts relied on the standard set in Pearson v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 2:16 pm
"City ordinance states what they should do," Grady said. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:26 am
[1] Aurdal v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:08 am
(See Bacon v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:13 am
Further, the court cited precedence where a person might reasonably infer that someone wearing a Confederate flag on their clothing might “harbor racial bias against African-Americans (United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:20 am
For example in People v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 3:00 am
Armstead v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:29 pm
The Supreme Court held in Elonis v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:15 pm
"Butler traced his defeat to three civil cases decided in 2005: the Miller Park case, which lowered the threshold for awarding punitive damages; the Ferdon case, which struck down the cap on medical malpractice damages for pain and suffering; and Thomas v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 5:31 am
In Bodine v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:16 am
(See People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:36 am
E*Trade Securities, LLC, Case No. 004579/2010), alleging that the Menlo Park, Calif. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 5:35 am
As you will see by reviewing this decision and the Fifth District's opinion in Pope v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:36 am
E*Trade Securities, LLC, Case No. 004579/2010), alleging that the Menlo Park, Calif. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 8:02 am
Affirmed.Case Name: DONNA RAY TEEPLES v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 8:12 pm
By Mike LimrickOn Friday, April 17, the Indiana Supreme Court issued two opinions.In Bannister v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 5:16 pm
Protect and Preserve Kahoma AHUPUA’A Assoc. v Maui Planning Commission, 2021 WL 2451978 (HI 6/16/2021) [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 11:08 am
In People v Eubanks, the defendant caused a fatal accident. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 9:21 am
For example, in People v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 6:41 pm
Supreme Court case that mandates this is Brady v. [read post]