Search for: "People v Johns" Results 7521 - 7540 of 9,055
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2010, 6:33 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The Maryland Daily Record has an article on oral arguments in Freed v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 am by Mary Whisner
Times, March 31, 2010:The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that lawyers for people thinking of pleading guilty to a crime must advise their clients who are not citizens about the possibility that they will be deported. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:00 am by Eric Turkewitz
For reasons that still escape me, he actually liked what he saw and asked if I would consider coming aboard.But he also noted that my posts regarding the torture-endorsing John Yoo , or the mockery of democracy that took place with Bush v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:45 pm by David Lat
Justice John Paul Stevens later expressed concern at the government’s position. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
 As a counterpoint to the above links, on his People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm by LindaMBeale
  NY State Division of Human Rights v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:46 pm by Ilya Somin
It brings together such otherwise disparate people as social conservative lawprof John Eastman (longtime chair of the Practice Group Executive Committee), and libertarians like co-blogger Randy Barnett and myself. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by Adam Thierer
McChesney and John Nichols, authors of the new book The Death and Life of American Journalism, have proposed a 4-part tax plan to raise money ($18-21 billion) for a massive $35 billion/year “public works” program for the press (with the remainder coming from other sources):[5] a 5% tax on consumer electronics (they estimate it would bring in $4 billion/year) a 3% tax on monthly ISP & cell phone bills (estimated $6 billion/year) a 2% sales tax on… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:25 am by site admin
John Copeland Nagle, Climate Exceptionalism, 40 Environmental Law Review 53 (2010) The Supreme Court appears to have rejected “climate exceptionalism” in Massacusetts v. [read post]