Search for: "People v. More" Results 7521 - 7540 of 43,579
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2017, 6:19 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
Two of the dissenters in Hamdi v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:04 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
As the Supreme Court struck down the core of the so-called "Defense of Marriage Act" in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:34 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
More Blog Posts: Workers’ Compensation Case May be Subject to Time Frame – Limith v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
More fundamentally, it almost certainly would better represent the constitutional preferences of the American people. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:38 pm
  We're getting less fuel per gallon than people in other states. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 7:28 am by Hanlon Law, PA
In Florida, people accused of crimes have numerous protections, including the right to be free from being tried or convicted more than once for the same offense. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Few people would do that, but some people who want to be big political players might. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:52 pm
But it is not the issue before this court Comment “But they haven’t done an equality impact assessment” is a fairly common complaint, although even that can be of less use to a challenge than people think; see, for instance, R(Brown) v SSWP [2008] EWHC 3158 (Admin) and R(Meany) v Harlow DC [2009] EWHC 559 (Admin). [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Jury SelectionR. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
That choice requires that we shield Westboro from tort liability for its picketing in this case.For more on Snyder v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 10:24 am
Police officers aren't "seeking legal advice" when they request a warrant from a magistrate any more than you and I are "seeking legal advice on complex issuse" when we pitch a motion to a trial judge or an appeal to the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Ayesha Christie, Matrix
The majority, agreeing with Girvan LJ in the Divisional Court, held that the ECtHR in S and Marper v UK [2009] 48 EHRR 50 was not considering the position of convicted people [2], and confined the principles of the Strasbourg decision to the retention of data obtained from unconvicted persons. [read post]