Search for: "Peter v. Peter"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 8,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2009, 7:33 am
Peter Gutmann. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 12:30 am
In Green v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 2:47 am
Peter RasmussenA D.C. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 1:58 am
Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited [2009] FCA 799 Lid dip: Peter Nicholas A little bit of trivia: Men at Work, with Down Under, are one of 9 pop acts that have achieved simultaneous No. 1s in both the UK and USA, according to Wikipedia. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
Peter Phillips, a commercial arbitrator and mediator based in New Jersey. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
Univ. of Pittsburgh v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
Fiser v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
" Amchem Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:19 am
In Blanch v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 9:53 am
Flanagan v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 10:30 pm
Jules Jurgensen/Rhapsody, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:45 pm
The list included John Mellancamp's "Our Country," Van Halen's "Right Now," Foo Fighter's "My Hero," Heart's "Barracuda," Orleans' "Still The One," and Gretchen Peters' "Independence Day. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:22 pm
Elms v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:10 pm
It's put together by some very smart people who work with orphans day in and day out (including our own Peter Hirtle). [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:09 pm
It's put together by some very smart people who work with orphans day in and day out (including our own Peter Hirtle). [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
CUSTOMS logo barred by sections 2(a) and 2(b): In re Peter S Herrick, PA (TTABlog) TTAB enters judgment on the pleadings against applicant who admitted non-use of its mark Esprit IP Limited v Mellbeck Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 1:20 pm
Peter Jaffe discusses the decision. [read post]
