Search for: "Richard Doeing" Results 7521 - 7540 of 14,142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am by Jim Duffy
  From the Articles of Eyre to the 2009 Act, via Robin Hood and Richard the Lionheart (the latter does not come out well), the Chief Coroner describes how ‘crowners’, as they were originally known, have evolved from lay magistrates or collectors of fines, to the judges they are today. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The Dodd-Frank Act, however, “specifically provides” that the say-on-pay vote (1) “shall not be binding on the issuer or the board of directors;” and (2) does not “create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of the board members. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The Dodd-Frank Act, however, “specifically provides” that the say-on-pay vote (1) “shall not be binding on the issuer or the board of directors;” and (2) does not “create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of the board members. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Dodd-Frank Act, however, “specifically provides” that the say-on-pay vote (1) “shall not be binding on the issuer or the board of directors;” and (2) does not “create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of the board members.” 15 U.S.C. § 78n-1(c)).  [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The Dodd-Frank Act, however, “specifically provides” that the say-on-pay vote (1) “shall not be binding on the issuer or the board of directors;” and (2) does not “create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of the board members. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 6:42 pm by Rick
It’s the sort of thing that I suspect would have shamed even Richard Nixon. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:49 am by Ken
Does the industry believe that the gift entitles them to ideological compliance from the recipient, and will their backers in the legislature reward that expectation? [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 2:16 pm by Sona Makker
What does threaten your job however, is another 4 years of the same Presidential administration. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 1:54 pm by David Kravets
The government does not have to identify the target or facility to be monitored. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:56 am by Carolyn Elefant
And maybe that would be OK, except that it does not have to be that way. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:56 pm by My name
[3] Richard Gruner, To Let the Punishment Fit the Organization: Sanctioning Corporate Offenders Through Corporate Probation, 16 Am. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:19 pm by Old Fox
Only other country that does anything close to this is Eritrea. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 6:28 am by SHG
Indeed, fear of such irrationality led Judge Richard A. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am by SHG
But there is not much science in why they happen… Here, it does not seem ridiculous that maybe this guy was induced to produce a false confession. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 11:03 am by Jason Cheung
Richard Lacks might not have a lot of tact, but he does have the right to express his views to his own employees (he’s also surprisingly honest and open). [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 11:03 am by Jason Cheung
Richard Lacks might not have a lot of tact, but he does have the right to express his views to his own employees (he’s also surprisingly honest and open). [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 11:03 am by Jason Cheung
Richard Lacks might not have a lot of tact, but he does have the right to express his views to his own employees (he’s also surprisingly honest and open). [read post]