Search for: "STATE v FIELD"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 12,942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2013, 6:50 am
Working in a diverse range of fields, he focuses in constitutional law and conflict law. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Consider the 1996 case of United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm
Gutierrez 13-347Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:39 am
Notes for--Planned Parenthood of SE PA v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:40 pm
The petition of the day is: Oneok Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am
AvePoint, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:24 am
Singer rules the field. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:23 am
Earlier in January, the state announced that local aid to the city for the last five months of the fiscal year was being reduced by $2.8 million. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
And in Dayco (Canada) Limited v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
But in Georgia v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm
The detection of the North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type 1 (NAP1) strain of C. difficile in retail ground beef is cause for concern. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:40 pm
See Cooper v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm
In Synthes USA v Spinal Kinetics (Fed. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm
The case went up to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which issued what is still the best opinion in favor of these constitutional arguments, Glik v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:47 am
United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Indeed, “student journalists increasingly arm themselves with mobile phones for multimedia newsgathering in the field. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:53 am
Our next post will discuss case management considerations. [1] See, e.g., Unger v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:53 am
Our next post will discuss case management considerations. [1] See, e.g., Unger v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 6:46 pm
The discussion covers the best-known decisions in the field – Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
