Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2014, 11:30 am
United States-Montes-Ruiz, No. 12-50398 (Rawlinson with Gould and Lemelle (EDLA)) --- In Setser v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 11:28 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:20 pm
Procedural HistoryBecton, Dickinson and Company (Becton) and Nova Biomedical Corporation (Nova) appeal the denial of various fees sought based on an eight-year long patent infringement suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California involving patents owned by Therasense, Inc. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
In the wake of the Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:50 am
At Reason.com, Damon Root looks at the issues in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:39 am
District for the Northern District of California seeking, as it wrote in its brief: a temporary restraining order and, after a hearing has been held, an order prohibiting, enjoining, and restraining defendants National Security Agency, United States of America, Department of Justice, Barack H. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
United Site Servs. of California, Inc., 2013 WL 2436605 (N.D. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 7:19 pm
“The United States District Court for the Central District of California entered summary judgment of non- infringement in favor of Google, Inc. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:59 pm
So far, no federal court of appeals has issued a final ruling on the issue since the Supreme Court’s decision last June, in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 6:25 pm
First, Cisco is an American company with offices throughout the United States, including in this state. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:37 pm
He's not entitled to be in the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 11:02 am
One case, United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:31 am
(“Danisco”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissing Danisco’s declaratory judgment action against Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:12 pm
No. 3015), to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit".A notice of appeal always has the broadest scope, but in a complex case like this, appellants typically later focus on a limited number of key issues. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:00 pm
The conduct was certainly disturbing, but the court, in Washington v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
On March 10, 2014, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Perhaps a set of basic governance devices as models would serve a useful purpose as well.In any case, this has been a long time coming in the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
Core Wireless, on the other hand, is a non-United States corporation with one employee that exists solely to license its patent portfolio. [read post]
