Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 7521 - 7540 of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2014, 1:57 am
Cases C-146/13 and C-147/13 Kingdom of Spain v European Parliament and Council of the European Union have now both reached the point at which Advocate General Bot has published his Opinion, which means that all that is left now is for the CJEU to determine whether it will follow his guidance (as happens around 80 per cent of the time) or articulate its own reasoning. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 12:21 pm by Elizabeth R. Kirk and Dr. Ingrid Skop
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:59 pm
(b) … any case known to counsel to be pending in this or any other court that will directly affect or be directly affected by this court’s decision in the pending appeal. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Dennis Crouch
Validity – Obviousness: B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Her subsequent counsel’s vague and noncommittal statement in court questioning the propriety of BIR’s bills was insufficient to constitute timely objection to BIR’s account stated claim. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Her subsequent counsel’s vague and noncommittal statement in court questioning the propriety of BIR’s bills was insufficient to constitute timely objection to BIR’s account stated claim. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am by clayton
The defendant, Benjamin Cruz, was charged with one count of possession of a class B controlled substance with the intent to distribute, G.L. c. 94C, § 32A (a ); possession of a class B controlled substance, G.L. c. 94C, § 34; and committing a controlled substances violation in a school zone, G.L. c. 94C, § 32J. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:08 am by Charlotte Garden
In contrast, Articles 10(b) and 10(c) reference freedom to “effect service” across borders via judicial officers. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am by NL
Another RSL 'starter tenancy' and s.21 case, albeit one that marginally pre-dated West Kent HA v Haycraft, is The Riverside Group Limited - v - Sharon Thomas [2012] EWHC 169 (QB) 2 March 2012 (Manchester District Registry) [Not on Bailii. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am by NL
Another RSL 'starter tenancy' and s.21 case, albeit one that marginally pre-dated West Kent HA v Haycraft, is The Riverside Group Limited - v - Sharon Thomas [2012] EWHC 169 (QB) 2 March 2012 (Manchester District Registry) [Not on Bailii. [read post]