Search for: "State v. So "
Results 7521 - 7540
of 116,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2019, 12:05 pm
Tune in as we plow through a host of recent (and not-so-recent) events in the world of national security law: Fazaga v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 5:28 am
The case of the day is Sbarro, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:53 am
Last week, the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland decided the case of Davis v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 5:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am
If so, s 117B is inapplicable and instead the relevant code will usually be found in s 117C. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:02 pm
The ban was the subject of multiple lawsuits including Stone v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 12:23 pm
Boyle v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:30 am
Comer, Town of Greece v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 3:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:13 am
State v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:18 am
The case is Carroll v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
Rowland's out-of-state lawyer came rolling into town promising a brawl, and crawled home looking not so much lame, but clueless. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 3:05 am
So, win your case, and the State of Louisiana need not pay it, ever. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:42 am
This week, I was asked my thoughts on the Supreme Court’s recent decision to take up the Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:13 am
Barnes v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:43 am
This definition is lifted directly from Council Directive 98/59/EC on the approximation of laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies (the “Collective Redundancy Directive”). [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:22 pm
If so, then, no, a criminal prosecution in California doesn't work, and it's got to be in whatever (random) state the plane happened to be in at the particular time of the slap. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 9:36 am
On Monday, April 30, 2007, the United States Supreme Court issued its final decision in the matter of KSR v. [read post]