Search for: "U.S. v. Mark"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 11,361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
“Mark, you should call Jeff. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
The same can apply for color trade marks and trade dress in the U.S. as long as the color has acquired a "secondary meaning" and is non-functional, i.e. the color does not function except as an indication as to source (Qualitex v Jacobson) Ask any shopper on Fifth Avenue and the AmeriKat thinks one could quickly come to the conclusion that the primary function of the red-sole is that of indicating the source of the shoe as being Louboutin - that or signalling to… [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:57 pm
This afternoon the U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:34 am
Lethal injections are on hold nationally while the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:25 am
” Deborah notes that, in fact, the recognition of trademark rights in retail store layouts was recognized by the Supreme Court in Two Pesos v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 9:46 am
Some analysts have suggested that the Mississippi stay, which marks the third reprieve granted by the Court since September 25, signals a de facto nationwide moratorium [CSM news report] on lethal injections until the Supreme Court reaches a decision in the lethal injection case - Baze v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:58 am
Similarly, other U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 6:00 pm
Dodger Productions, Inc The U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 2:18 am
Matthew Poston, D2010-1748 (WIPO November 29, 2010) each party held a trademark for GREENPLY in the same Class; the Complainant in India, the Respondent in the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:49 pm
Young, U.S. v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:21 am
Mark and Marcia LaForest v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:36 pm
He then offers some context: At first glance, the annulment of the Enron award marks the latest in a string of upheavals which have lent some uncertainty to the resolution of disputes between Argentina and foreign investors.The June 29, 2010 annulment ruling*** in the Sempra v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Sources: Transcript of Oral Arguments City of Ontario v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:47 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006)). [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Sources: Transcript of Oral Arguments City of Ontario v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 9:41 pm
This marks four years that the Court has met its target of clearing those argued cases from its docket by the end of June, roughly matching the U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 12:18 pm
., dissenting) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:26 am
" (Internal quotation marks omitted.) [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 12:32 pm
Schultz, 487 U.S. 474, 487 (1988). [read post]
