Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 7541 - 7560
of 9,064
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2010, 5:06 am
Arizona courts agree that "enforcement of immigration laws often involves a relevant consideration of ethnic factors. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:42 pm
LEXIS 30 (AZ 7/12/2010) Despite striking the (F)(3) aggravator, the Arizona Supreme Court has affirmed the conviction [h/t Arizona Capital Representation Project] People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:18 am
Supreme Court case is Quill Corporation v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 3:10 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 10:13 pm
For example, an Arizona jury awarded a homeowner and his family more than $4 million for a case where the insurance carrier delayed remediating mold contamination (Hatley v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
Arizona, the U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Honestly, it's about like watching paint dry and lacked the grand standing by Senators seen in Supreme Court nominee hearings. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Minn. 1998), the court predicted that Arizona would reject market share liability. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 12:17 pm
Supreme Court has made clear that '[t]he States enjoy no power with respect to the classification of aliens.' Plyler v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:42 am
Arizona in light of the Court’s recent decision in Berghuis v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am
As I’ve done for the last several years, here’s a recap of the major US Supreme Court decisions of the past term, focusing on criminal and civil liberties issues. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm
In Plyler, the issue was whether the state of Texas could exclude children present in the country without documentation from attending public schools, and the Supremes said, by a 5-4 vote, no, that violates the Equal Protections Clause. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:16 am
” The Supreme Court: An Inherently Partisan Institution? [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 7:50 am
Instead it is the Florida State Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:42 am
If the federal courts strike down this law (and I’m leaning towards hoping that they do), we can only hope that the authorities in Arizona abide by their rulings, and don’t try and pull a George Wallace. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:50 am
Can you imagine concluding your research without reading the Supreme Court’s seminal decision, Miranda v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:35 am
The authors urge the U.S. and Arizona Supreme Courts to “reconsider the endorsement of race-based law enforcement. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
Since the Supreme Court found in 1977 in Bates v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
Since the Supreme Court found in 1977 in Bates v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:16 am
Appointment of Federal and Supreme Court Judges with a clear agenda to change the constitution from the bench 27. [read post]
