Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 7541 - 7560
of 8,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2008, 10:15 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:02 pm
The release order, it went on, “contravenes the basic principle that the decision whether to allow an alien into the United States rests exclusively with the political branches. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 6:07 pm
The case, Kerrigan v. the state Commissioner of Public Health, was brought by eight same-sex couples who were denied marriage licenses by the Madison town clerk. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 5:14 am
The ambiguously worded amendment appears to give federal courts both subject matter jurisdiction, which Congress clearly intended, and personal jurisdiction over the seven nations currently listed by the Executive Branch as "state sponsors of terrorism. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
Litigation isn't the answer to all society's woes, and some problems are best left to the democratic branches of government to solve.Now, in fairness, we have to add that the PLAL doesn't profess to change things all that much. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:34 am
Could you point me to the provisions you believe prohibit the judicial branch from posting the docket information? [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:00 pm
Case Name: Board of Professional Responsibility v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Gideon V. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:29 pm
Davis (2001) and Clark v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:06 am
This is thought to be the first claim brought in the UK for damages based on the cause of action developed by the ECJ in the case of Köbler v Republik Österreich (Case C-224/01).The claim concerned two judgments of the Court of Appeal of 1999 and 2000, in which the Council for the Protection of Rural England, of which the claimant was a trustee of the London branch, had been refused judicial review of decisions by local authorities in London (R. v London Borough… [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 6:32 am
Eric Segall (Georgia State University - College of Law) has posted The Taxing Law of Taxpayer Standing (Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 7:58 pm
In 2001, the Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas v. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 3:42 pm
And Chafetz admits this: [Biden] sa[id] that "Article I of the Constitution defines the role of the vice president of the United States, that's the Executive Branch. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 3:06 pm
"United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 2:13 pm
"So the woman who can't name a case other than Roe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
The Maine State Employees Association ("MSEA") is a union designated by the State of Maine as the exclusive bargaining agent for certain employees of its executive branch. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 8:16 pm
A case like Schenck v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 4:37 am
A definitive court case on the issue of free speech and political expression, Branch Ministries Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 9:58 pm
Spitzer is horrified by the case that became DC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:45 pm
But it has summarily reversed judgments upholding such two-house vetoes -- see, e.g., United States Senate v. [read post]
