Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 7541 - 7560
of 12,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2013, 5:22 am
C 10–01192 JSW, 2011 U.S. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:23 am
Inspection and remediation at any remaining major or long-term suppliers to each company (“Tier 2 factories”). [read post]
18 May 2013, 2:06 pm
Section 227(b)(3) allows individuals or companies to bring private lawsuits “based on a violation of this subsection” or the FCC’s implementing regulations. [read post]
18 May 2013, 7:12 am
C. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:40 am
The company Alexam was founded by the inventor Robert Dorf who filed for patent protection back in 1997. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:53 am
§ 2000aa(c). [read post]
14 May 2013, 5:10 am
Don’t let A or B be the only options, propose C or D as a new way of working. [read post]
13 May 2013, 2:24 pm
For what it’s worth, I did have the revision notes of which I spoke in the post but they were a) tailored for my course and not Jodie’s, b) the fruit of my exam-time labours (why should I share them) and c) let me ask you this: would you, even as a desperate law student, risk asking a complete stranger on the internet for revision notes of which you have no assurance of quality, accuracy or anything else? [read post]
13 May 2013, 1:00 pm
Recently, in an August 30, 2012 letter (which was subsequently released publicly), the large international law firm K&L Gates LLP provided a legal opinion to AngelList LLC, the operator of an online angel investment platform, that it (a) is not required to register as a broker-dealer under federal securities laws and (b) companies posting information to accredited investors on the AngelList website are not engaged in a general solicitation in violation of Rule 506. [read post]
12 May 2013, 8:51 am
Policy C. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:00 am
MIP filed a notice of opposition ex Article 42 of Regulation 40/94 (Article 41 CTMR), relying on Article 8(1)(b) of the same Regulation. macros consult GmbH, on the other hand, submitted an application for a declaration of invalidity of MIP's figurative sign, under Articles 52(1)(c) and 55 of Regulation 40/94 (Articles 53(1)(c) and 56 CTMR). [read post]
7 May 2013, 6:39 pm
Of course § 8(c) clearly does this. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:50 am
The procedures required (by section 2(b)(4) and (b)(5) of the bill) in turn look in two directions and seem muddled. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:00 am
But the Southern District of New York, in particular, has split over whether Janus applies beyond the context of private actions brought under Rule 10b-5(b). [read post]
7 May 2013, 6:30 am
Three requirements had to be satisfied: The judgment in the earlier action must be (a) of a court of competent jurisdiction, (b) final and conclusive and (c) on the merits. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:00 am
Editor Michael B. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:16 am
Code §2252(a)(4)(B), receiving obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
5 May 2013, 11:01 am
(c) Section 33: The film producers argue that the proviso of Section 33(1) violates Article 19(1)(c) which safeguards right to join (and right not to joint) an association. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:08 pm
As more and more states opted out, it was necessary to switch to “plan B” – or those federal exchanges. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:48 am
“[C]ollateral estoppel may be appropriate where administrative agencies are acting in a judicial capacity. [read post]
