Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 7541 - 7560 of 48,978
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2020, 6:53 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In Battiston v Microsoft Canada Inc (“Microsoft”), an employee was wrongfully dismissed because his employer had failed to bring a harsh termination clause to his attention. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Denise Page Hood's opinion last Thursday in Cambridge Dental, LLC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:30 am by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
” Because Owner prevailed, he was awarded his costs on appeal. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:15 am by Adam Levitin
This means that the "can't pay" debtors are moved through bankruptcy incredibly quickly and at a very low cost. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm by Riana Harvey
He also examined the question of who should pay the costs of implementing such orders, as tackled by the Supreme Court in Cartier v Sky, before moving on to look at how website blocking injunctions have been extended to non-IP cases, as in the case of Nintendo v Sky (see IPKat here). [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:16 pm by Robert Chesney
More specifically, these four authorities provide that the NCD may: monitor the effectiveness of implementation efforts (including their “cost-effectiveness”); give advice to agency/department heads regarding personnel, budget, organization, etc.; review agency budgets for consistency with national policies/strategies and give advice to the agency heads on where they may be falling short; and assess the “integration and interoperability” of various Federal cyber… [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Susan Landau
Given the extent of personal information on an individual’s phone, such searches have been found to contravene Fourth Amendment protections; in Riley v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 5:06 pm by Adam Levitin
" It's impossible (I think) to square this with the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Czyzewski v. [read post]