Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 7541 - 7560
of 8,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2009, 10:51 am
Supreme Court, in Tory v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 4:38 pm
A recent trial court decision from Superior Court Judge Tommy Hankinson of the Griffin Judicial Circuit illustrates one of the many difficulties of enforcing a non-compete provision in Georgia. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 4:29 pm
See Peregoy v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 1:06 pm
Courtney Michelle Love, filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles on May 26, 2009. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:23 pm
Superior Court, 31 Cal.App.4th 1206, 37 Cal. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 1:33 pm
The plaintiffs in Sokol Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
Superior Court, 4 Cal.3d 800, 814 (1974). [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:05 am
But a federal district court does not have jurisdiction to hear a case removed from a state court if the state court did not have jurisdiction to hear it. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
I think I found it (finally) in last month's decision by the Ninth Circuit in Moss v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Guenther v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 4:41 am
-based fashion designer who operates the "Boudoir Queen" line of clothing, sued Love in Los Angeles County Superior Court, alleging defamation, false light invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, breach of contract and tortious interference with economic advantage(Dawn Simorangkir a/k/a Dawn Younger-Smith a/k/a Boudoir Queen v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:13 pm
Superior Court, Matter of Cooperman, Evans v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 3:51 pm
The petition — in Brown, et al., v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:13 am
Superior Court, 157 P.3d 1017, 1022 (Cal. 2007) (emphasis added), one would reasonably expect that the California definition was categorically broader than the definition at common law, which requires a "substantial step towards committing the crime," United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:41 pm
Clarke, R (on the application of) v Cardiff University [2009] EWHC 2148 (Admin) was a judicial review of Cardiff University Law School brought by a BVC student from 2004/5, Ms Clarke. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:12 pm
For example, you can see a list of most litigants from the lower court record in Case Number: BC332406 at the LA Superior Court website. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
There have been a number of County Court judgments on this issue which have not necessarily been ad idem (see eg our post on Augustin v Barnet). [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 10:01 pm
Superior Court (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 426, 429. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 12:53 pm
Hawkins because it does not mention impact fees. [read post]
