Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 7541 - 7560 of 13,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2017, 5:42 am by Joy Waltemath
Although the FLSA does not address who owns tips, the DOL sought to do so through rulemaking. 29 C.F.R. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:42 pm by Simon Gibbs
These comments might be easier to dismiss in other circumstances but for a number of issues: 1. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:24 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Mark J. Levin
  Nothing restricts the right of a consumer who does not like arbitration to change the bank he or she uses to one that does not use arbitration. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 1:45 pm by Ana Popovich
The report includes information relevant to the timespan of January 1 through December 31, 2020. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
In her testimony, Thomas reiterated under oath that she does not talk to her husband about her political activities and he does not discuss his work on the court. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 3:16 pm by Paulo McKeeby and Amanda Brown
Specifically, section 11(c) states: No person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee because such employee has filed any complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or related to this Act or has testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding or because of the exercise by such employee on behalf of himself or others of any right afforded by this Act. 29 U.S.C. section 660(c)(1). [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 9:21 pm by dbmadmin
Approval of Settlement The FTC approved the settlement by a 4-1 vote. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:51 am
However, nothing in Indiana Code Section 3-13-1-15 expressly states that a failure to strictly comply with it voids the result of an election or that the place of filing of the CAN-29 form is an essential element of an election. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:28 pm by Steve Sheinberg
   The Article 29 Working Party, in its working document interpreting Article 26(1), considers that such an interpretation is unlikely as the concept of an employment contract can be interpreted so broadly, as there is no direct and objective link between performance of an employment contract and such a transfer of data (WP 114 at 14). [read post]
  But that: (1) does not tell us whether any constitutional amendment other than the thirteenth might be “absolute;” and (2) certainly does not mean that the protection against slavery and involuntary servitude apart from punishment imposed for a criminal conviction is anything other than absolute. [read post]