Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 7541 - 7560 of 12,453
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
(Count 1); substantive child sex trafficking of E.P. [read post]
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
While acknowledging the principle, upheld in Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Ltd [1979] 1 QB 156, that a locality may have some inevitable nuisance from an activity previously allowed or permitted in law, “r this does not mean that the mere fact that houses have been built around the boundary of the sewage treatment works at Mogden means that odour from the sewage treatment works cannot be a nuisance. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
While acknowledging the principle, upheld in Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Ltd [1979] 1 QB 156, that a locality may have some inevitable nuisance from an activity previously allowed or permitted in law, “r this does not mean that the mere fact that houses have been built around the boundary of the sewage treatment works at Mogden means that odour from the sewage treatment works cannot be a nuisance. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:34 am
Several law firms are cutting associate pay.In any event, for the first time since the beginning of the year, we are seeing a slowdown in terms of overall layoff numbers:1,125 (May 2009)1,500 (April 2009)3,500 (March 2009)2,000 (February 2009)1,500 (January 2009)Does this mean that the worst of the layoffs are behind us? [read post]
The new VMT methodology will not be mandatory until July 1, 2020, unless implemented early by a lead agency, as has been done by the City of San Francisco. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Supreme Court has had the occasion to consider when a contract of adhesion is unconscionable.[1] In doing so the Court asserts its ability to apply equitable considerations in cases of unconscionable contracts and should bring caution to the minds of all contract drafters so that their terms are communicated better and onerous terms or outcomes are brought to the attention of the vulnerable party. [read post]
  Appellants filed their revised brief on June 1, 2021 in which they argue that the FTC does not have the authority to impose some of the remedies that the FTC has imposed. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
It’s a summary of all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted from October 27 – November 16, 2023 inclusive. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm by Steven Hansen
In such cases, petitioners must notify the Commission of their intent to rely on materials previously submitted.Such reliance does not affect petitioners’ obligation to demonstrate that they meet all requirements of this paragraph as required by subparagraph (B)(ii). [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
Affirming the judge's findings, the Board found that turnover since the Respondent's commission of the unfair labor practices does not militate against a bargaining order. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
While shareholder proposals that limit management entrenchment can add value to a company,[27] others may not. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 2:37 pm by Mark Kantor
… In reply, Defendant asserts that Rule A-1 does not prohibit the filing of AAA appeals and that the AAA’s Consumer Arbitration Rules apply to its appeal. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 6:51 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On 27 April 2004, defendant was apprehended for violating the conditions of his probation for his 1997 conviction for robbery in the third degree. [read post]