Search for: "In Re Brand"
Results 7541 - 7560
of 14,134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2014, 5:31 pm
That way they know their content and brand is protected. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
Brand as persona: Lots of these goods were staples not individually branded; retailers had a lot of power. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
There we’re moving to allowing that, but what about uses by other firms? [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:01 pm
Apparently he wanted to trade one brand of PTSD for another. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:25 am
It’s a shame we’re still so far from understanding equality in this country that those signs couldn’t simply say “Bad4Us. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
Many of 1830s and 1840s brands were being marketed in America and UK. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:00 am
We’re all a little self-centered like that. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 10:54 pm
” Two of the Administration’s June 2013 initiatives relate to PAE litigation: a proposed PTO rule that would require reporting of real party in interest (re-branded as “attributable ownership”) information in patents and patent applications, and an online toolkit providing links and other information for the recipients of patent demand letters. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:51 pm
If you or a family member became ill with a Listeria infection after consuming food and you’re interested in pursuing a legal claim, contact the Marler Clark Listeria attorneys for a free case evaluation. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:03 am
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has recalled a brand of alfalfa sprouts due to a possible salmonella contamination. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
For example, one of the images in the RADIO DAYS library was a cross-branding example, mixing Betty Boop with a poster for the 1950s B movie "Attack of the 50ft Woman" to make a picture called "Attack of the 50ft Boop" with Betty Boop's head transposed onto the head of the eponymous 50ft woman. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
In re Magverz, Inc., Serial No. 85614128 (February 21, 2014) [not precedential].Because the involved goods are, in part, identical, the Board must presume that these identical goods travel in the same channels of trade to the same classes of consumers. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:26 pm
You’d think they’re one in the same. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 12:07 pm
“It’s a reminder that performance claims need to be substantiated before they’re made,” says Szentesi.Rogers was represented on the case by Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
At EFF, we’re often asked the question: Why should anyone care about surveillance in other countries? [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:12 am
(Um, no, they’re not in a subsequent civil suit for violation of the relevant legal duties?) [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 11:00 pm
In Canal walk we’ve got a Topshop, we’ve also accommodated some of the freestanding UK brands like Lipsy and Dune. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 10:55 pm
In re Cook Medical Technologies LLC, 105 U.S.P.Q.2d 1377 (TTAB 2012) [precedential]. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 6:01 pm
” In the more familiar sexual harassment context, comments by a supervisor who called a new sales associate a “hot mama” during her first week at work, told her he was glad to have somebody to look at, commented on her clothes and how she walked, shared sexually tinged jokes, discussed his own marital unhappiness, and said “somebody’s going to think that we’re doing something nasty in here,” were neither severe nor pervasive enough to create… [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 5:24 pm
Moran, who’s worked with some pretty large brands, is right. [read post]
