Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 7541 - 7560 of 18,112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 pm
But this sometimes does small justice to the ideologies--the principles and normative frames of reference--from out of which the provisions are conceived and against which they might be judged. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:50 am by Alan Gura
Well before Justice Antonin Scalia’s passing, judges figured out that District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:16 pm by Michael Grossman
” In 1987, the Texas Supreme Court ruled in El Chico Corp. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:39 am
The IPKat posted a report earlier this week of the case Hospira v Cubist, in which three patents belonging to Cubist were revoked by Mr Justice Carr. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The delay suggests a re-trial, but it is not clear. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 5:04 am by SHG
But this was the DEA, the government, and they’re special. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:07 am by Sherrilyn Ifill
” Several weeks after the decision was handed down, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg added that she does not “expect that we’re going to see another affirmative action case, at least in education. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:57 am
Four justices concurred, including Justice Harlan who filed a limited concurring opinion. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:52 am
 Mr Justice Carr found all three patents to be invalid.The 417 patent:This patent claimed daptomycin doses of 3-10 mg/kg to be taken once every 24 hours. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 6:32 am by MBettman
So, absent any emergency hearings, this week will be the last set of oral arguments heard by Justice Judy Lanzinger and Justice Paul Pfeifer, neither of whom can run for re-election because of the age limits in the Ohio Constitution. [read post]