Search for: "Line v. People" Results 7541 - 7560 of 13,534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2014, 11:32 pm by Nietzer
The process should have thought and the decision made by people who are the experts within the company on such matters. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
  The text of the lectures was at the time available on-line. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 1:01 pm
 Because people with money on the line are much, much, much smarter than people in black robes who might say "Oh, it's only an investigation, no actual fraud. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:11 am by Eric Penzer
  A court should not employ a presumption where to do so would “elevate a legal construct above common sense” (People v Giordano, 87 NY2d 441 [1995]). [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 5:02 am
They were telling them how much money was there, how many people -- or how many victims might be there. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  If process claims are available, and relevant to consumers, in many more contexts than previously realized, among other things that has implications for the First Amendment treatment of advertising regulation—compare the claims made in the Nike v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm
 (Bexis and Alexander are BOTH zip lining in exotic locales as we type this.) [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:15 am by SHG
Put enough exceptions next to each other and you come out with a decision like State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 2:24 pm
And I am just trying to figure out from you how you square your reliance on this kind of personal and jurisprudent line in the atmosphere of colleges and universities as you have a population of young people, who for lack of a better word, don’t process in the same way that we do when we’re in our late 20s and 30s. [read post]