Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 7541 - 7560 of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Whether any of this really matters in CEQA actions (and I tend to think it does) may ultimately depend on how broadly or narrowly one defines the term “administrative remedies. [read post]
8 May 2024, 11:18 am by John B. Palley
The episode I listened to had a caller who I don’t think identified which state she was in but, obviously, that matters. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am by April Doss
 Those claims were rejected by both the district court and court of appeals, and I don’t address them here.) [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 2:02 am by Florian Mueller
The reason I don't want to say so is simply that I don't believe Google will make much headway, if any. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:01 am by Hilary Hurd
§ 1702(b)(3), limits the president’s authority to regulate informational materials under IEEPA. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Orin Kerr
That matters, I think, because Fourth Amendment law has long developed different rules for searching containers and searching cars. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 7:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The court was tempted to direct entry of judgment for Mead on the National Union/PBM matter, but remanded for factual development on the issue of harm—at oral argument, National Union’s counsel essentially conceded she couldn’t show harm, “[b]ut we hesitate to base a decision on a concession made in the heat of oral argument under a barrage by the judges. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
& Loan Assn. (1974) 10 Cal. 3d 665, 673.Defendant has claimed that the various statements and notices it sentplaintiff “established” that certain payments were missed and that as of March,2008, plaintiff owed $4,290.24 (see exhibit C to Whitener’s supportingdeclaration), as of July, 2008 he owed $6,530.99 (exhibit C to the complaint), andas of December, 2008 he owed $8,688.01 (exhibit B to the complaint).But these amounts aren’t fully explained in any of… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:46 am by Steve McConnell
We dare you to read the opinion and tell us what the "reasonable basis" is for the failure to warn claims, given that Mensing is the law of the land.In any event, according to the Hughes court, it doesn't matter, because the plaintiffs also alleged design defect claims against Mylan Pennsylvania. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:40 am by Katherine Gallo
§§ 2025.450(b)(2)(pdf)), 2025.480(pdf), 2030.300(b)(pdf), 2031.310(b)(pdf), 2032.250(pdf) and 2033.290(pdf) was for the lawyers to revisit their position, in good faith discuss a resolution and avoid unnecessary discovery motions. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am by MBettman
  At issue in the case was an as-applied constitutional challenge to the caps on noneconomic tort damages set out in R.C. 2315.18(B). [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:38 am by Maxwell Kennerly
The above numbers don’t even touch upon the cost of an intensive care unit (or, worse, a specialized ICU, like the neonatal or cardiac ones) or continued rehabilitative care. [read post]