Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 7541 - 7560 of 19,798
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2017, 3:43 am by SHG
But this wasn’t merely a matter of students being “touched,” because there was a good chance the police would utilize that magic voodoo method where his 900 students would be searched without being touched? [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm by Hannah Dockendorff
See Ed Struzik, As Arctic Melts, Inuit Face Tensions with Outside World, Yale Env’t 360 (Oct. 1, 2012), http://e360.yale.edu~feature/asarctic_meltsinuitfacetensionswith_outside-world2577, archived at http://perma.cc/MN5H-Z7PK. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm by Hannah Dockendorff
See Ed Struzik, As Arctic Melts, Inuit Face Tensions with Outside World, Yale Env’t 360 (Oct. 1, 2012), http://e360.yale.edu~feature/asarctic_meltsinuitfacetensionswith_outside-world2577, archived at http://perma.cc/MN5H-Z7PK. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm by Hannah Dockendorff
See Ed Struzik, As Arctic Melts, Inuit Face Tensions with Outside World, Yale Env’t 360 (Oct. 1, 2012), http://e360.yale.edu~feature/asarctic_meltsinuitfacetensionswith_outside-world2577, archived at http://perma.cc/MN5H-Z7PK. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Zach Abels
“I was the Mahmudiya expert,” he said matter-of-factly. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm by Josh Blackman
Marshall wrote, “[T]he majority demands only ‘facial’ legitimacy and good faith,” which “means that this Court will never ‘look behind’ any reason the Attorney General gives. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:59 am by Helen Klein Murillo, Benjamin Wittes
Of course, we don’t know for sure that there is a grand jury proceeding to obstruct. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
Now on to the things that really matter. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:10 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Accordingly, the appellant is treated as relying on its written case.Main Request - Claims 1 to 5Disclosure of the invention - Article 100(b) and Article 83 EPC2. [read post]
31 May 2017, 2:06 pm by John Pottow
(If you want to see my thoughts on the matter, see pages 15–24 of the amicus brief I co-authored with Asher Steinberg in a case I argued at the Seventh Circuit two weeks ago.) [read post]
31 May 2017, 11:45 am by Russell Spivak, Ashley Deeks
” The panel then explains why, in its opinion, “[t]he FAA’s arguments to the contrary are unpersuasive. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:14 am
The court referenced other evidence of a dispute between the victim and the two codefendants and explained the texts were not offered for the truth of the matter asserted but as circumstantial evidence of motive and intent.People v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am by David Canton
Security is a whack a mole game that is constantly changing – it doesn’t follow the “Universal operating instructions” joke of “Set lever A and lever B”. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that “[b]allot access has become a sharply partisan issue in several states, with Republicans typically seeking to raise barriers to voting and Democrats trying to remove obstacles. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Retainer Agreement provided for a time-based fee where charges were based on the amount of time spent on the matter. [read post]
30 May 2017, 6:07 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
  Facebook https://www.facebook.com/events/1861273817531282Co-Sponsor: Middlesex County Estate Planning CouncilTo attend email VercammenLaw@Njlaws.comOther Information call 732-572-0500Can’t attend? [read post]
30 May 2017, 6:06 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Set up a testamentary trust in your Will for Protection for spouses and leaving assets to children:        The Credit Shelter Trust (sometimes referred to as a “Bypass Trust” or an “A/B Trust”) was a popular estate planning technique used by married couples with combined assets to avoid the NJ Estate Tax. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
"On that basis, the Supreme Court basically held that Lexmark couldn't impose the restrictions it relied upon in this litigation, and that this wouldn't work for Lexmark even if the first sale occurred outside the United States (the one scenario of the two in which the district court sided with Lexmark). [read post]